Yet Another Argument For Homeschooling December 5, 2008
Posted by The Underground Conservative in Gummint-Run Skoolz, Homosexuality, Rainbow Mafia, Uncategorized.trackback
Right here in Wisconsin.
A high school senior at Pecotonica High school brought home a questionnaire from his English class which asked this provocative question:
Is it possible that your heterosexuality stems from a neurotic fear of others of the same sex?
The first obvious question is what does this have to do with an English class? I took four years of English in high school. There was nothing like this in any English class I took. Most of it was literature, composition, grammar, writing, poetry. Shakespeare too, which I enjoyed. Nothing from the agenda of the Rainbow Mafia.
The mother, Marilyn Hanson, reviewed the questionnaire and thought it completely inappropriate for any class, but especially for a required English class, where, Hanson told WND, “They should be taught to read and write and prepare for college.”
“I really believe this was outright indoctrination to the homosexual viewpoint,” Hanson said. “I could see this being discussed in a debate class, where both sides were presented. But the other side was not presented.”
Hanson told WND, “I think they’re trying to shove [homosexuality] down our throats.”
Ram it down our throats. Not to mention into other parts of our anatomy.
I can’t even see it in a debate class, to be honest, because I do not trust our gummint-run skoolz to play anything down the middle and be fair and balanced.
Here is the rest of the questionnaire:
- What do you think caused your heterosexuality?
- When and how did you decide you were a heterosexual?
- Is it possible that your heterosexuality is just a phase you may grow out of?
- Is it possible that your heterosexuality stems from a neurotic fear of others of the same sex?
- Do your parents know that you are straight? Do your friends and/or roommate(s) know? How did they react?
- Why do you insist on flaunting your heterosexuality? Can’t you just be who you are and keep it quiet?
- Why do heterosexuals feel compelled to seduce others into their lifestyles?
- A disproportionate majority of child molesters are heterosexual. So you consider it safe to expose children to heterosexual teachers?
- With all the societal support marriage receives, the divorce rate is spiraling. Why are there so few stable relationships among heterosexuals?
- Statistics show that lesbians have the lowest incidence of sexually transmitted diseases. Is it really safe for a woman to maintain a heterosexual lifestyle and run the risk of disease and pregnancy?
- Considering the menace of overpopulation, how could the human race survive if everyone were heterosexual?
- Would you want your child to be heterosexual, knowing the problems that s/he would face?
More details:
Hanson told WND she went the next morning to see her son’s teacher at Pecatonica High School
in tiny Blanchardville, Wis., population 806.“What does this questionnaire have to do with English class?” Hanson asked.
Hanson told WND the teacher’s response was that the questions were not an assignment but a discussion guide for the day’s class on “tolerance.”
“As I was talking to the principal,” Hanson said, “I told him tolerance is fine. We shouldn’t be mean or call people names. We want to love homosexuals, but I think this goes beyond tolerance.”
Principal Dave McSherry, however, told WND that the discussion was part of a comprehensive curriculum in critical thinking skills, preparing the students to make decisions on their own in college and beyond.
Nothing will happen, of course, but both the teacher and the principal should be fired. This has nothing to do with critical thinking skills but all to do with indoctrination of politically correct ideas and harassment of a politically incorrect lifestyle, namely heterosexuality — read: a normal lifestyle. Sorry, but homosexual is not the new black. Some may be inclined toward it, but those who pursue that lifestyle still act on those impulses. Heterosexual men and women — those attracted to the opposite sex — normally don’t philander and pursue extramarital affairs. Note: Bill Clinton as well as other political figures and most celebritards in Hollywood are the exception rather than the rule.
Here’s what makes it another argument for homeschooling, no matter what the unhinged Joy Behar says:
“Why is the abuse of this rule on controversial issues being done by this teacher and principal?” Hanson asked. “I think it’s behind the parents’ backs, because unless the students show their parents this worksheet, they aren’t going to know about it.”
Hanson also contacted legal organizations, but she told WND that they advised unless parents can pressure the school into changing its policy on controversial topics, she has little legal recourse.
Comments
Sorry comments are closed for this entry
Analytical thinking is nothing to be ashamed of.
But the other thing you got wrong was your silly statement on adultery.
From the NYTimes:
The most consistent data on infidelity come from the General Social Survey, sponsored by the National Science Foundation and based at the University of Chicago, which has used a national representative sample to track the opinions and social behaviors of Americans since 1972. The survey data show that in any given year, about 10 percent of married people — 12 percent of men and 7 percent of women — say they have had sex outside their marriage.
But detailed analysis of the data from 1991 to 2006, to be presented next month by Dr. Atkins at the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies conference in Orlando, show some surprising shifts. University of Washington researchers have found that the lifetime rate of infidelity for men over 60 increased to 28 percent in 2006, up from 20 percent in 1991. For women over 60, the increase is more striking: to 15 percent, up from 5 percent in 1991.
The researchers also see big changes in relatively new marriages. About 20 percent of men and 15 percent of women under 35 say they have ever been unfaithful, up from about 15 and 12 percent respectively.
Story can be found at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/health/28well.html?pagewanted=print
I’ve added a quote and link to your site on BlobWatch Education
[...] over at The Undercover Conservative, posted an interesting piece on how the public education system is literally ramming the homosexual [...]
[...] Yet Another Argument For Homeschooling – The Underground Conservative [...]
There’s about a billion non-sexual topics a teacher could make kids read and write about if they actually cared about “analytical thinking.”
A disproportionate majority of child molesters are heterosexual. So you consider it safe to expose children to heterosexual teachers?
So…is the teacher a lesbian or a child molester? The parents should inquire.
There’s more on that story from al-New York Times that needs to be added for perspective, We’ve spent years removing the social stigma from philandering and why are we surprised it’s on the increase? That, plus the wonderful example displayed by the endless parade of human debris known here as celebritards, those who cannot keep their pants on or their flies zipped on a regular basis.
And yes, Heather’s right. Analytical thought can be taught with subjects other than this one. This was pure brainwashing, pure intimidation driven by a radical agenda.