A Q & A Session With Jody Harding

Some follow-up to the Racine mayoral forum from Monday night: candidate Jody Harding has submitted her answers in writing to all of the questions asked of the candidates. The format allowed only selected candidates to answer each question, presumably due to time constraints.

I have agreed to publish her answers here in their entirety.

Economy – Section 1

1. 18.6 percent of Racine’s mortgages are underwater and foreclosures are rising. What steps will you take to address these issues?

The most important thing we can do keep people in Racine in their homes is to get them working. It is imperative that we create a business-friendly environment that encourages new business to locate here, and allows existing business to expand. We do that by ending the trend toward constantly increasing regulations, and by curbing the power of an over-zealous Development Council that tells business owners what type of business they can open, where it can be located, and even what color they can paint the building.

The second thing we can do to help struggling homeowners is to get our property tax rates under control. Property tax makes up a large part of most mortgage payments, and our tax bills have gone up over 30% in the last 6 years. Incomes, even for those with secure jobs, have not kept pace. We must re-evaluate government spending, and learn to distinguish wants from needs. Government needs to eliminate waste, reduce debt and learn to live within our means, just as we expect our citizens to do.

Finally, organizations like UNIT, must be reigned in. A property owner who is struggling to make a house payment doesn’t have the money to replace peeling paint or repair a damaged gutter. Fining that owner an additional $50 he can’t afford, and eliminating his ability to argue that fine, only makes the problem worse, increases stress and encourages one more families to leave the area.

2. The population is down approximately 10% in Racine, what can be done to reverse this trend?

I speak with people every day who are just waiting for a chance to “get out” of Racine. Their reasons are almost always the same: Their children are in danger. They and their children have no future here. They want to leave before taxes eat up their retirement income. Generally, an air of hopelessness permeates this city.

Solutions for safety come naturally from within our neighborhoods. Neighborhood Watch and other groups are driving out crime one block at a time. While police play an important role, the city must get behind these grassroots organizations who are making the real progress, and give them the support, coordination and resources that they need.

Secondly, in order to give a future to our residents, we must make Racine a business-friendly community. We must stop the over-regulation that dictates what type of business can come here, where it can be located and even what color the building can be painted. People with an entrepreneurial and creative spirit should have the freedom to expand their ideas and their business. The benefit for all of us is growth in jobs and opportunities.

Finally, we must stop taxing our people to the breaking point. Our tax rates have driven business and families out of town. We must re-evaluate government spending, and learn to distinguish wants from needs. We need to eliminate waste, reduce debt and learn to live within our means.

3. Are there opportunities for consolidation in the city budget? If so, what specifically are they?

There are many opportunities for consolidation in the budget. The best-publicized area is the consolidation of city and county police and fire dispatch. Much has been made of the tendencies of department heads to want to retain control of what they consider to be “their” people and resources. These attitudes can be overcome by people who have the best interest of the community at heart. Consolidation in this case will take more than just moving two offices into one building and training people to work together. We need a firm plan and a timeline to make this project work, but the problems are not insurmountable. The benefits in efficiency and resource savings are more than worth the effort.

There are also other kinds of consolidation that can be preformed within our city government. As a business manager, I have reviewed many jobs and departments for potential consolidation and redistribution of work for greater efficiency. The mayor has an on-going responsibility to be aware of what is happening within city offices, and to discuss strategies for improvement with department heads. American business has been forced to get leaner and learn to do more with less. Government should be following those same trends.

4. What is the biggest problem facing the city of Racine? What steps will you take to fix it?

The single biggest problem facing Racine is the sense of despair that hangs over all our people. We have raised a generation of young- and not-so-young people who don’t value education because they don’t believe they will find a job even after they graduate. Too many of our citizens believe what has become a sort of “urban myth,” that there is some kind of conspiracy that keeps people of certain ethnic or economic backgrounds from advancing. Even many of our middle- and upper-class residents believe Racine is a dying town.

If Racine is to survive, we must change this attitude of despair into one of hope. We must prove to our young people that there will be employment ready for them, by encouraging job-providing business to locate and stay here. We must provide hope for home ownership by keeping property taxes low so that mortgage payments remain within reach. We must provide an atmosphere of opportunity to those who take new and innovative approach to business, and not smother them with unnecessary regulation.

Finally, we must return a sense of individual responsibility to all of our citizens, punishing those who disrupt our peace and prosperity, but without hindering law-abiding individuals in their pursuit of happiness.

5. Explain your anti-poverty agenda, what is the first action on the list, and who you would work with to gain support and achieve success?

The most important part of fighting poverty is education. First, we need to make sure that every child in Racine learns the basic skills of reading, writing, using a computer and managing his own finances.

Secondly, we need to make sure that people who lack that education have the opportunity to acquire it. There are many government and private organizations that provide help with rent, food and transportation, as well as information about how to go about getting a GED, or where to get training in a specific skill.

Unfortunately, many people who want to change their life by getting an education and a job don’t know where to start. I would like to see the city create an office that coordinates information from all of the organizations that provide public services. If a young woman with a baby wants to go back to school, it should be easy for her to find answers to questions like, “Who will take care of my baby while I’m in class? How will I pay my rent?” If we had a one-stop-shop to provide these answers, more people could take advantage of the resources that are available to them.

Finally, we must educate all of our citizens to knowledge of their own potential. The city must support the local organizations that are reaching out and teaching people that the only limit to their success is the limit they place on themselves.

6. What plans do you have to bring new businesses to Racine?

Business will not come to Racine until we get the problems of crime, taxation and over-regulation under control. Our police do a good job of solving crime, but they are not responsible for preventing crime. Prevention must come from within the community. There are already a number of organizations that are making good progress making our neighborhoods safer. The city needs to get behind these groups and give them the support, coordination and resources they need.

Secondly, we need to cut the waste from our budgets and get our taxes under control. We have already seen business leave the city and move just outside our borders where they are not strangled by city taxes. And not taxes only. Business-owners are becoming seriously over-regulated. Downtown merchants have to follow rules about everything from the design of their signage to the colors they can paint their buildings. People with the drive and creativity to generate business and jobs shouldn’t be hampered by unnecessary rules imposed by bureaucrats.

Finally, we need to be able to provide incoming business with an available workforce. While we have more than our share of unemployed persons looking for work, we need to make sure our citizens have both the technical skills, and the “soft skills” employers value.

7. How will you balance between avoiding increases in real estate taxes with an under-funded budget?

In fact, once we distinguish between “wants” and “needs”, we find that our budget is not underfunded. What we have in the budget is a large amount of waste that needs to be cut out. We need to get our capital spending under control so that we do not add new debt every time some old debt is paid off. We need to consider the city budget like any other business or personal budget, and learn to live within our means. This means giving more thought as to whether we can get another year or two out of that city vehicle, and whether now is the right time to start a remodel project.

A decrease (or even a lack of increase) in city taxes leaves more money in the hands of our citizens. That means business has more money to expand, and to pay employees. It means individuals have more money to spend within the community, and support our local shops. It means rents and costs of other goods and services aren’t forced to go up in order to cover an ever-increasing tax burden.

Some people at this table feel we can fund city expenses with money we receive from State and Federal government. We have to remember that state and federal money also comes from the pockets of our citizens. We have to reduce the total burden we are placing on our people if we want our economy to grow and our city to prosper.

8. Much was made by city politicians about the new LGBT Center opening on Junction Avenue in the City’s Uptown Corridor redevelopment district. Would you have supported the LGBT Center’s zoning application request? Why or Why not?

Our city council needs to decide whether or not they want try to legislate morality. They claimed that they could not refuse the zoning request of the LGBT Center because it implied a moral judgment. Later that same evening they refused a liquor license to a retailer because there were already “enough” liquor stores in the area – a moral judgment. You can’t have it both ways.

In my opinion, moral judgments do not belong in bureaucratic decisions. The people running the LGBT Center have every right to use property they own for any lawful purpose, and the city council was right in approving their application. If residents of the neighborhood and other members of Racine society do not want this center here, they have a number of peaceful and legal ways of encouraging the group to locate elsewhere.

At the same time, I believe that the person who wanted the liquor license should not have been denied. He also has every right to use his property as he sees fit. If there were in fact, “enough” liquor stores in that area, his business would have gone broke and the problem would have been solved without bureaucratic interference.

In short, I don’t believe the government should have the right – short of safety concerns – to tell law-abiding citizens how to use their own property.

Environment/Transportation – Section 2

1. Racine has taken part in the Mayoral Compact on Climate Change. What are your intentions as Mayor regarding this agreement?

I have read the agreement, and I would have no objection to signing it. Its actions can largely be summed up by saying that we agree to recommend governmental policies that encourage reduced greenhouse emissions, that we carefully consider the environment when making land-use decisions, and that we do our best to educate our citizens to the benefits of environmentally sound actions. In many cases, environmentally wise decisions are also wise from an economic and efficiency viewpoint. “Reduce – Reuse – Recycle” benefits both our environment and our pocketbook.

2. What measures can the city take to help businesses and homeowners who want to be more energy efficient?

I would like to see the city create an office that coordinates information from all of the organizations that provide public services, including those that promote energy efficiency. A homeowner who doesn’t have the cash to add extra insulation to this home might do so if he learned about a program that would help him cover the cost.

The best way to promote energy efficiency is through education. Most people today are aware of the need to keep our air and water clean. They know they need to recycle, and they know they shouldn’t pour the oil from their car down the sewer drain. But beyond that, many people don’t know what they can do, or what resources are available, to help keep Racine clean and green.

There are a number of government and private organizations that work with individuals and businesses to promote energy efficiency. I know of one organization that helps landlords pay for installing energy efficient windows in their apartments. A state agency gives rebates to homeowners who install new, energy efficient furnaces.

Everyone understands the benefits of energy conservation. We need to improve awareness of what we can do, and what help is available, to help us conserve.

3. Would you support a Green Building ordinance that would require green building as part of the city’s building code?

I believe that the fewer regulations we put on business, the better off we all are. Building codes are designed to protect people’s safety. Keeping the public safe from sub-standard materials and shoddy workmanship is the proper business of government. Demanding specific levels of energy efficiency from a builder has nothing to do with safety and is not properly part of a bureaucratic decision.

If you drive out along Highway 31, you will see new housing developments. When you talk to the builders and the new owners, you will find that these homes have been built with outstanding energy efficiency in everything from triple-glazed windows to ultra-efficient furnaces. These efficiencies were not mandated by law, but were demanded by educated home buyers. The builders included these benefits in order to get the best price for their homes.

Education and enlightened self-interest has largely answered the question of “green building” without any government interference. I don’t see any reason why government should try to regulate something that is working fine on its own.

4. Do you think there should be city ordinances to support alternative energy in Racine? If so, which would you propose or support?

I would be very happy to see Racine convert all city vehicles to natural gas until a more efficient fuel is developed. I would also be glad to see the city provide some sort of tax incentive to individuals and businesses that took quantifiable measures to increase energy efficiency.

As of this date, I have not heard of any alternative energy ordinances proposed for Racine. I believe that the fewer regulations we put on business, the better off we all are; therefore, I would have to consider any such proposed ordinances very carefully.

5. What steps would you propose to restore our parks and natural areas?

Racine has a number of beautiful parks and natural areas that, to the best of my knowledge, are not in particular need of restoration. They do, of course, need to be kept beautiful. To that end we have an on-going need for education about littering, vandalism, and the removal or destruction of plants and other natural objects from the area.

As long as crime – particularly petty crime – is prevalent in our city, it might be a good idea to punish offenders by sentencing them to community service, and such service could include helping with the care and maintenance of our parks. This would increase the amount of labor available for maintaining the parks, and would give offenders a chance to experience the work involved in their upkeep. They would not only learn a little something about nature conservancy, but might even develop a greater appreciation for, and pride in, the condition of our natural areas.

6. Please outline your plans for Racine’s bus system.

Racine has a viable bus system but it is terribly underdeveloped and underutilized. Last year, a review of the bus routes was prepared and studied with an eye to increased efficiencies. I believe that study needs to be expanded to include not only what lanes are carrying sufficient riders, but where ridership could be increased by adding or changing destinations.

I have talked to a number of people who would take the bus if it went farther outside city limits. We know there are people who need reliable transportation to the interstate and back. We know there are specific locations where high concentrations of jobs would indicate a need for public transportation, but there is none available. If we want to make efficient use of our bus system, these needs must be met. In a number of cases, it will require coordination and cooperation with county services.

And of course, education is particularly important. Many cities have developed advertising campaigns that promote bus ridership through increased awareness of bus amenities, schedules, destinations and charges. Many people are surprised when they find that our buses are clean, comfortable, inexpensive and will take them exactly where they want to go.

7. Is Racine isolated from other communities? If so, what is your proposal to link Racine to the quality of life and economic opportunities that surround us?

I do not feel that Racine is particularly isolated. We are surrounded by small but active communities, and have easy access to Kenosha and Milwaukee. Both Highways 20 and 11 provide fast and easy access to Interstate 94, and the freight rail system delivers goods directly downtown. We do need to expand our bus system so that transportation is available from the city all the way to the interstate. This addition to the system should be easy to implement, but will need the cooperation of our surrounding communities and the county.

Racine’s infrastructure has two areas that are in need of significant improvement. First, there is no good way to get downtown without traveling over twisting roads congested with local traffic. Second, the same issue arises when delivery trucks need to move downtown or get to one of our industrial parks. One reason we have had so much trouble filling those parks may be because of the difficulty in getting large delivery vehicles to that area.

We need to design and fund an improved roadway system that allows easy access to downtown and the industrial areas close to the lake. It is possible we may be able to use Federal and State stimulus money for that sort of project.

8. Do you support the proposed KRM commuter rail? Please Explain.

The KRM is a very bad idea for Racine at this time. It’s huge expense can only be realistically funded by an increased sales tax, something Racine taxpayers cannot afford. Although the proponents of the sales tax claim that we would see a corresponding reduction in property tax, I find that argument to be both disingenuous and unrealistic. While property tax might dip slightly and temporarily, we would see no real long-term decreases.

KRM proponents claim that the rail line will bring business and prosperity to Racine. I ask that they remember the old “North Shore Line” which made the same promises forty years ago. That line did not bring the promised prosperity and went out of business due to lack of ridership.

The final argument against building the KRM is the simple fact that its perceived need has already been filled. The main difference between the proposed rail line and the existing bus line is that the bus has rubber wheels. The bus is privately operated, requiring only a small taxpayer subsidy. It currently stops at precisely the same downtown location the rail is expected to stop. It is a clean coach bus with all of the amenities the rail is expected to supply, and has the additional advantage of being able to change its route as needs change.

The bus has one other thing in common with KRM: almost no one rides it. It is doubtful that rail will fare any better.

Safety/Quality of Life – Section 3

1. What do you believe are the root causes of violent crime in Racine and what corrective measures will you take in your first year?

Violent crime in Racine is usually gang or drug related. The most important thing we can do is to keep our young people out of the drug and gang culture. Many grassroots organizations are making progress in that area, and the city should be working with them to make sure they have the support and resources they need to continue and expand their work.

Unfortunately, those groups don’t work overnight, and we need something to immediately reduce violent crime. The first step I see is cracking down on the drug deals that take place openly in our neighborhoods. Police have been more inclined to break up these deals than to arrest the participants, partly to avoid putting more people into our already overcrowded courts and jails. I say that building a new jail is cheaper for the community in the long run than having lives lost and headlines that read like the tabloids

We can also get the help and adopt the methods of crime task forces that are making outstanding progress in Chicago and Milwaukee. Spending money on this type of police activity is infinitely more effective than throwing it away on “feel good” programs like security cameras.

2. According to a Journal Times article published February 16, 2007, infant mortality in Racine is among the highest in the state, and it is responsible for more deaths each year than homicides. This is especially true among African American Women where the rate has risen instead of declined. What steps will you take as Mayor to address this silent killer in Racine?

As with most of Racine’s issues, education is key. Most of the infant deaths take place among poor women who have no insurance, and no real knowledge of how to take care of themselves during pregnancy, or their child after birth.

We have organizations in this community that are dedicated to helping low income mothers with counseling about nutrition and other health matters, and can help mothers and children get the professional health care they need. But many people don’t know these organizations exist or how to contact them. I would like to see the city create an office that coordinates information from all of the organizations that provide public services, so that people looking for help can go to a central source and find out what options are available to them.

3. What ideas do you have for reducing gang activity in Racine urban neighborhoods?

The most important thing we can do is to keep our young people out of the drug and gang culture in the first place. Many grassroots organizations are making progress in that area, and the city should be working with them to make sure they have the support and resources they need to continue and expand their work.

We can also get the help and adopt the methods of gang task forces that are making outstanding progress in Chicago and Milwaukee. Spending money on this type of police activity is infinitely more effective than throwing it away on “feel good” programs like security cameras.

Finally, by creating a business-friendly environment in Racine, we provide jobs and a future to young people who would otherwise see little value in education or personal effort. Hope for the future is one thing every living creature needs, and we must provide it for our citizens.

4. If a proven incident of racial profiling took place by police officers, what corrective measures would you take?

Since racial profiling is prohibited, any officer who is convicted of it should be immediately punished. Depending on the severity of the incident, punishment could be anything from a written warning to dismissal from the police department.

Of course, the best way to deal with this issue is to prevent it. Our police officers need to be educated in exactly what constitutes racial profiling, how to avoid it, and what procedures are effective in gaining their objective without using it.

5. How would you address fear in the immigrant community if they are afraid to come forward as witnesses to a crime if they are concerned they will be interrogated by police about their immigration status?

Illegal immigration is a highly emotional issue in America today. The mayor cannot make decisions in this area based on his or her feelings, but has a sworn duty to uphold the law. We therefore cannot offer amnesty to any illegal immigrant in exchange for witness information.

What we can do is educate the entire immigrant community that those who are here legally have nothing to fear from the police or immigration officials, and then we must take steps to make sure that that assurance is truthful. Many legal immigrants are afraid that they will be rounded up with illegals and deported in spite of their legal status. We must take steps, exaggerated steps if necessary, to make sure that doesn’t happen, and that all of our legal residents feel safe.

We must also let our immigrant communities know that, wherever second-hand knowledge is useful or acceptable, a legal immigrant can freely give the police information obtained from an illegal friend without naming or endangering that friend. Our first priority in this situation is to drive violence and crime out of our community.

6. What is your opinion of the AODA (Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse) services offered in Racine and would you support efforts to improve/expand services for those who don’t have insurance? Do you have any ideas about funding such services?

The AODA services are very important and should certainly be expanded to meet the needs of any person who is serious about ending substance dependency. There are many national organizations that help fund these services, and a good use of the city’s grant-writer would be to research and apply for these dollars. In addition, confiscated property belonging to drug dealers, as well as drug and alcohol related fines could be channeled to help fund these services.

7. Education is frequently cited as the most important factor in a child’s life in order to prevent future homelessness. What would you do as mayor to have an impact on public education for homeless students in our city?

The first step in helping homeless students is to get them into a stable environment. The city owns a number of properties that could be turned into half-way houses for the homeless. This would give individuals and families a clean and safe place to regroup, take stock of their situation and formulate a plan of action. It would also give them a base from which to apply for the services they need, and receive information about education and job opportunities they might otherwise miss.

Counselors running these houses would have the opportunity to advise students in particular about the value of education, the process for continuing or getting back into school, and direct them to resources for transportation and other needs.

8. Currently, Federal money has been ear marked for Racine to prevent homelessness. What would you like to see that money spent on?

The city owns a number of properties that could be turned into half-way houses for the homeless. This would give individuals and families a clean and safe place to regroup, take stock of their situation and formulate a plan of action. It would also give them a base from which to apply for the services they need, and receive information about education and job opportunities they might otherwise miss.

Counselors running these houses would have the opportunity to advise residents of available options. It would also allow them to identify those people with mental and emotional issues that might make living alone impossible for them, and to insure that those persons receive the right kind of help for their situation.

Lefty Group Caught Lying

H/T to Fred at RDW.

And in other news, the sun rose in the east this morning, the Pope was revealed to be Catholic and the bear was caught on camera taking a dump in the woods.

Seems North Shore Exponent got a piece of mail from Citizen Action flat-out lying about the so-called improvement in the graduation rate of Milwaukee Public Schools under the “leadership” of Peter Blewett.

Citizen Action’s flyer claims MPS graduation rates have increased 38 percent under Blewett’s, ahem, leadership. In 2001-2002, the MPS graduation rate was 60 percent. In 2006-2007, the graduation rate was 69 percent. That’s a 9 percent increase.

Even if you represent the figures as a percentage increase, that 9 percent increase is only a 15 percent increase over the original rate. To get to 38 percent (38 percent of 60), the rate would have had to increase 22.8 percent, or be at 82.8 percent. Not in anyone’s wildest dreams did MPS accomplish that.

The Mayoral Forum

Went to the mayoral forum at Gateway Technical College tonight. You can read the ho-hum nothing to see here move along coverage in the Journal Times here. I will get back to my problems with the newspaper’s coverage in a bit.

My reaction to what I heard was quite frankly not encouraging overall. The two biggest problems facing Racine in addition to a lack of leadership are crime and taxes. The crime in Racine is out of control, and it’s a tax hell. The property tax assessment shell game that began under former Mayor Jim Smith and exploded under former Mayor McPervert is threatening to drive people out of their homes.

What shell game? The practice of assessing and re-assessing homes based on factors beyond the homeowners’ control. Things like the sale of overpriced homes in the general vicinity. Hypothetical improvements, too. Works like imputed income. The city quickly figured out that they could lower the levy and claim they had lowered taxes while the property tax bills just kept going up and up. All the while the city would just raise the assessment.

Take the house I own, for example. The only reason my house is standing is that the termites are holding hands. A real estate guy who lives in the area told me before the housing market meltdown that he might be able to get me $60,000 if I sold it. What’s it assessed at by the city? Try $119,000. Why? Well, the house next door was sold three years ago for $125,000. A house two blocks east and one block north went for $140,000.

The house next door has a two car carage, nice new vinyl siding, a patio deck, a fenced in yard, etc. All sorts of amenities. Mine? 980 square feet, no garage, no patio, no vinyl siding, 50 year old windows and doors, needs a complete painting and re-carpeting. There’s a slab for a garage and a patio, but those went in before I owned the house and the previous owners ran out of money to finish the job.

Don’t look at me to finish it. The property taxes of $3,200 a year are enough to wish the damn thing would burn. I bet the neighbors would like that, too. It’s the eyesore of the neighborhood.

Most of what I heard tonight was same ol’, same ol’. Blah, blah, blah, need more money for schools, blah, blah, blah, Racine isn’t that bad, blah, blah, blah, need more jobs, blah, blah, blah, need the KRM choo-choo, blah, blah, blah. Same ol’, same ol’.

Crime? Most of what I heard tonight was that the crime problem stems from poverty and the lack of jobs, the same old mantra we’ve been hearing from the Left for 45 years ow. Never mind that we’ve spent $2 trillion on anti-poverty programs and have yet to see any decrease in the poverty rate. And, if it were true that poverty causes crime, the crime rate during the Great Depression should have been higher than it is now. If anything, we have a poverty of values and that causes crime. The “what’s mine is mine and what’s yours is half mine” mentality. The “I’m entitled so it’s OK to steal” mentality. And so on.

Taxes? Hardly a word, despite the tax hell that is Racine. It’s as if the group — with one exception that I will get to shortly — is OK with the tax hell and almost seems to think like Gordon Gekko in Wall Street — “Greed (read: taxes) is good.”

No one — with one notable exception — touched on the need to reduce the tax load on homeowners and property owners and even implied we needed to spend more and demand more money from Uncle Jimbo and Uncle Barack.

Most of the candidates are local political insiders. They’ve been in power since time immemorial. They are part of the problem. What the hell have the guys who are on or have been on the Common Council been doing all these years except contributing to the sinkhole we’re in? That includes the political hacks that were or are in the state legislature. Madison insiders are running Bob Turner, state representative from Racine and a former member of the Common Council, just so that the Democrat hacks from Madison who’ve done such a wonderful job turning the state into an upholstered tax hell can attach the puppet strings to the mayor’s office in Racine. Plus, Turner is arguably one of the worst public speakers I have ever heard. About half of his words were unintelligible and the ones that were came out in a speaking voice made for newsprint.

The outsider candidate would appear to be Jody Harding, a CPA making her first run for public office. She was the only candidate who did not support the KRM black hole choo-choo, did not think the upholstered Port-a-John known as Racine Unified was that way because it just needs more money, did not think we can spend our way out of the predicament we are in, did not think that more cops is the answer to crime. In short, she seems to think outside the box. She understands that we cannot tax and spend our way out of the mess we are in. Businesses with jobs will not come to Racine if we are viewed as a crime-ridden tax hell. And building the choo-choo won’t bring them here, either.

But being the outsider resulted in the short shrift from the Journal Times for Harding. Most of the newspaper’s story focused on the insiders, one of which is John Dickert, who made one of the two most toxic statements tonight. Dickert, a consummate insider even though he holds no elective office, in answer to a question about mandates for homeowners to go green, supported such mandates. Screw you, John. It’s none of the government’s business how I heat my home, what type of windows, doors and insulation I use or anything else. Oh, another point for Harding: she was the only candidate on the panel that hadn’t consumed the global warming kool-aid.

The other toxic comment came from Jim Spangenberg, a current member of the Common Council, who parroted Our Lord and Savior Barack Hussein Obama by saying that we have an obligation to get involved in community service. Once again, the hell with that noise. I am obliged to do nothing other than grow old and die.

The other interesting development was when I exited Gateway and went to my car in the large parking lot on the east side of the building near the south end of the campus. Racine police had the south part of the parking lot and the streets east and south of Gateway blocked off. An overturned canoe had been found in Lake Michigan and rescue efforts were launched presuming someone was in the lake.

Good news to report: the canoe’s owner was located safe and sound and no one was injured. The rescue effort and search has been called off.

Changing DPI

On Tuesday, April 7, voters in Wisconsin have a chance to send areal message of hope and change, presuming those words haven’t been trashed in meaning, by electing Rose Fernandez as state superintendent of schools.

The state superintendent of schools has been a toady of the state teachers union forever. That would be WEAC, or the Wisconsin Extortion Association Council.

A side note on the origins of the reference to extortion: the late, great William F. Buckley once referred to the National Education Association as the “National Extortion Association.” The reference is appropriate; all they do is extort money out of taxpayers.

WEAC’s hack is Tony Evers, Fernandez’s opponent. He couldn’t even earn the endorsement of the liberal Wisconsin State Journal, which backed Fernandez.

Wisconsin voters have a clear choice in the April 7 race for state superintendent of the Department of Public Instruction.

The race features a consummate and careful insider, Tony Evers, versus a spirited and straightforward outsider, Rose Fernandez.

The State Journal endorses Fernandez.

The pediatric nurse and mother of five will be a strong advocate for change — someone who will use the mostly symbolic post of state schools superintendent as a bully pulpit to press for reforms, many of which President Barack Obama favors.

With so many high school students failing to graduate in Milwaukee, with so much at stake for Wisconsin in the changing, knowledge-based economy, Fernandez is the best candidate to invigorate DPI.

“Consummate and careful insider” is just a nice way of describing Evers as a political hack and toady for WEAC, which has dominated Wisconsin’s schools and resisted meaningful change for far too long.

Our schools are falling apart, not because of a lack of money — see your property tax bill for proof — but because WEAC strangles any real reform to what really counts — what goes on inside the classroom, namely teaching and learning.

Students leave Wisconsin schools knowing less and less but feeling better about themselves annually. It’s time that changes. It won’t happen overnight, but electing Rose Fernandez is the first step.

Patrick McIlheran also supports Fernandez here.

The Messiah Has A Gorbasm

Wonder if Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ Barack Hussein Obama thinks the Soviet Union is still in existence and Mikhail Gorbachev is in power.

MOSCOW (al-Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama has held talks with Mikhail Gorbachev, a spokesman for the former Soviet leader said on Monday, in the latest sign of Washington’s efforts to “press the reset button” on ties with Russia.

Spokesman Konstantin Petrenko said Gorbachev met Obama and Vice President Joe Biden — who coined the ‘reset’ phrase last month — in Washington last Friday. He did not give any details of the discussion.

Oh, and Patterico’s Pontifications already directs us to the Andrew Sullivan, the faux conservative, and his “Leave Obama Alone” screed.

In the comments thread at Patterico is this funny song parody of The Wall by Pink Floyd.

THE WALLBAMA by Pink Sullivan
I don’t need no education
I already got that thought control
No dark sarcasm for my muscled hero
Right wingers leave my Obama alone
Hey! Neocons! Leave my Obama alone!
All in all I’m just another brick in Obama’s wall.
All in all I’m just another prick in Obama’s wall.

I already had a revelation
I see his pecs and lose control
No doubts about my new obsession
Right wingers leave my Obama alone
Hey! Neocons! Leave my Obama alone!
All in all I’m just another brick in Obama’s wall.
All in all I’m just another prick in Obama’s wall.

This might be Andrew Sullivan:

The Punch-Drunk Messiah

I guess it’s performances like this — utterly cringeworthy — that’s made liberal callers to conservative radio talk shows virtually nonexiistent. Who in their right mind can possibly defend this level of utter incompetence?

Our Lord and Savior Barack Hussein Obama made a complete fool of Himself in a See BS News 60 Minutes interview with Steve Croft. Laughing and giggling at odd moments, Obama looked completely out of His element. Croft actually asked tough questions, rather than the softballs The Anointed One is used to getting.

From The Politico:

President Barack Obama said he believes the global financial system remains at risk of implosion with the failure of Citigroup or AIG, which could touch off “an even more destructive recession and potentially depression.”

His remarks came in a“60 Minutes” interview in which he was pressed by Steve Kroft for laughing and chuckling several times while discussing the perilous state of the world’s economy.

“You’re sitting here. And you’re— you are laughing. You are laughing about some of these problems. Are people going to look at this and say, ‘I mean, he’s sitting there just making jokes about money—’ How do you deal with— I mean: explain. . .” Kroft asked at one point.

“Are you punch-drunk?” Kroft said.

Certain elements in the Drive By Media may be beginning to realize that the Boy Messiah has no clothes. Croft is no conservative and is not part of any Vast Right Wing Media conspiracy. Don’t forget: See BS News and 60 Minutes are part of the Dan Rather “fake but accurate” attempted hit job on President Bush.

As Charlie Sykes points out here, The Messiah managed to lose Peggy Noonan and Eleanor Rodham Clift on the same weekend.

You know it’s over when the thrill stops going up Chris Matthews’ leg when he hears the Chocolate Jesus speak.

Oh, anyone who thinks the Drive By Media still won’t be in the tank for the Democrats in the mid-term elections and when Our Savior runs for re-election in 2012 is just naive.

Although President Palin seems better with each passing day.

Another Foreign Policy Faux Pas

Ouch. Another d-ohhhhhhhhhh! moment for the Democrat Amateur Hour in the White House.

Seems Our Lord and Savior Barack Hussein Obama, on top of the gaffe involving the reset button with Russia, on top of the cheesy gift of 25 DVDs in the wrong format to the Prime Minister of great Britain, on top of the gaffe involving His ubiquitous teleprompter and the Prime Minister of Ireland, decides to write a letter to the president of France.

Make that the former president of France, Jockstrap Chirac, the corrupt, bumbling appeasement monkey who was on the payroll of Saddam Hussein and thus opposed U.S. efforts to remove Hussein from power.

Here’s what The Messiah wrote:

I am certain that we will be able to work together, in the coming four years, in a spirit of peace and friendship to build a safer world.

Problem is, Le Surrender Monkey is no longer in power. The president of France is Nicolas Sarkozy. Has been since 2007. And Sarkozy is not pleased, especially since the Chocolate Jesus can’t seem to find time to meet with him.

By the way, can you imagine the laughter and ridicule if, say, George W. Bush wrote a letter to a former president or prime minister of another country in his first few months in office?

Oh, and President Palin is sounding better and better with each gaffe by these amateurs and buffoons.

Ace of Spades has this list of The Anointed One’s gaffes:

1. Canada: NAFTA fiasco.

2. Poland: missile shield “misunderstanding”.

3. UK: Churchhill bust return.

4. Russia: “overcharge” button.

5. UK: insulting gifts to the Browns.

6. France: not realizing that Chirac has been out of power for two years.

7. Brazil: Misspelling the president’s name.

8. Mexico: NAFTA

9. India: Thinking Kashmir is Pah-kee-stan.

An ACORN Appointment

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review notices that Our Lord and Savior Barack hussein Obama has appointed an avid supporter of ACORN — Association of Corrupted Organizations for Registration of Non-eligible voters — to the federal appellate bench in the 7th Circuit Court.

The Capital Research Center’s Matthew Vadum reports that President Obama’s first appointment to the federal bench carries an oversized piece of baggage. U.S. District Judge David F. Hamilton of Indiana, nominated to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, worked as a fundraiser for the liberal activist group ACORN, now being scrutinized on myriad voter registration fraud allegations. The Judicial Confirmation Network calls Judge Hamilton “an ACLU liberal.” That’s evident in Hamilton’s 2005 ruling, overturned on appeal, that barred prayers that mention Jesus Christ to open daily sessions of the Indiana House of Representatives. Next!

Hopefully Senate Republicans can turn the tables on the Democrats and filibuster this bastard.

It’s part of The Messiah’s grandiose scheme to give the thugs and criminals from ACORN unfettered access to the process of remaking America in its corrupted image. Imagine if we gave, say, the Gambino crime family unfettered access to the process of remaking America.

Different group of criminals, same result.

More Pay Limits

From Scott Ott at Scrappleface via Lakeshore Laments comes this brilliant parody:

(2009-03-22) — With the debate over AIG executive bonuses nearly bringing official Washington to a standstill in the past three weeks, the Obama administration today expanded its plan to control Wall Street executive pay, adding provisions to limit compensation for star performers in the National Football League (NFL), National Basketball Association (NBA) and Major League Baseball (MLB).

“Some of these sports stars, like AIG execs, have negotiated sweetheart deals paying them millions of dollars, and yet they lose games,” said White House spokesman Robert Gibbs. “The president shares the outrage of the American people at these obscene salaries and bonuses. There’s nothing that makes the little people feel littler than the thought of these fat cats getting fatter just because that have specialized skills that are in high demand in a free-market economy.”

Indeed, the White House released a recent poll showing that 75 percent of Americans answered ‘Yes’ to the following question: “Do you believe President Obama should personally limit the compensation of anyone who earns a lot more than you do?”

“How hard can it be to show up on Sunday and toss a few passes?” said Mr. Gibbs. “The fact that some people earn a lot more money than others just demonstrates the savage inequalities inherent in a capitalist system, and explains why the president has taken deliberate action to end it.”

Under the terms of the pay-limit plan, the president would appoint a panel of university economists, union leaders, and “ordinary American community organizers” to establish paycheck parity between average hourly-wage workers and the people “who have carved out for themselves an unequal portion of the pie.”

“In America you can dream as big as you want, but everyone agrees we need strict controls on those whose dreams have come true,” Mr. Gibbs said. “The people deserve a system in which there are no limits to your potential, only to your achievements.”

Effective parody has a grain of truth in it, and this one sure does, since Our Lord and Savior’s appeal is based on class envy and class warfare and depends on the government as the great equalizer, to get even for you with someone who’s achieved more than you have because that’s not fair.

One more bit of the parody that also rings true:

The proposal would exempt most Hollywood stars and popular recording artists, he said, “since much of their money is already returned to the people in the form of contributions to the Democrat party and its candidates.”

Ouch. You know the entertainment industry would be exempted from any maximum wage law because of its influence with the Democrat Party.

Kevin Binversie asks a good question:

Why are any of us attempting to better our lives again, when government appears to simply want to punish success?