The TOTUS Goes To School

The Left used to make fun of President Bush non-stop for supposedly not being able to give a speech let alone make off the cuff remarks.

Granted, GWB will never be mistaken for Ronald Reagan or Bill Clinton in that department, but he more than held his own. Why? Because what he said came from his heart. He didn’t have to recite thoughts written for him by someone else.

Fast forward to this week. The Most Eloquent Orator of Our Time — more eloquent than Winston Churchill — went to a sixth-grade classroom. Guess who went along with Him?

That’s right. The TOTUS — the Teleprompter of the United States.

Via The Powers That Be:

What an empty suit. Barack Hussein Obama, the Messiah, cannot even talk to a classroom of sixth graders without His trusty teleprompter.

Contrast that with this image of President Bush talking to schoolchildren:

And the content of his talk was more policy wonk drivel about spending more money.

Paula at It’s Only Words has some advice for Our Lord and Savior.

The New MPS Superintendent

The deck chairs on the Titanic just got rearranged: Milwaukee Public Schools has a new superintendent.

MILWAUKEE – The Board of Directors for the Milwaukee Public Schools chose a new Superintendent of Schools Friday who will replace current Superintendent William Andrekopoulos when he retires in the coming months.

Dr. Gregory Thornton is the man the board selected - his job will become official July 1st.

Dr. Thornton comes to Milwaukee from his position as the superintendent of the Chester Upland School District in Pennsylvania, a position he has held for about 3 years.

Let’s see. New superintendent? Check. Same ol’ educational bureaucracy? Check. Same ol’ teachers union? Check. Same ol’ school board that serves as rubber stamps for the status quo? Check.

Cue up the band with Nearer My God To Thee.

California Doubles Down On Stupid

Following the lead of the Obama administration and congressional Democrats, the state of California is hellbent on driving the nearly bankrupt state off a cliff and into the abyss … by mandating state-run health insurance with a ban on private insurance.

Keep in mind that California is already amidst a chronic and prolonged budget crisis brought on by runaway spending and exorbitant taxing. Perennially listed among the worst states in our Union to do business, California features 10%+ income taxes and the highest regulatory burden around. So imposing are the costs to business in California, despite its ports and natural resources, Nevada and its desert is #1 in the Country in new business development.

As Congressman Tom McClintock famously says, only government policy could convince people and business to relocate from lush California to the barren deserts of Nevada. The practical result of those anti-job polices is that California now has a revenue problem. Just 3 years ago revenues were in the $125 billion dollar range. Now they are in the $85+ billion dollar range. In other words, government has created a revenue problem by killing off jobs and, without those jobs, there are less taxpayers, less income tax and less sales tax.

Rather than make California job friendly again – and thereby increase government revenues through sales taxes and new income taxes from new jobs – California Democrats offer nothing but tax hikes and even more regulation. And now this.

California is bankrupt. It’s been the laboratory for every single liberal policy imaginable. Tax, tax, tax. Spend, spend, spend. Regulate, regulate, regulate. Mandate, mandate, mandate.

It’s the United States 10 years from now if we continue down the path chartered by Barack Hussein Obama and his progressive allies in Congress.

Watch the Second American Revolution started in Massachusetts spread to California by November.

Barrett Campaign FAIL

This is puzzling, especially for a man who says he wants to be Wisconsin’s next governor.

From Chris Conley at WSAU-AM in Wausau:

Candidate for Governor Tom Barrett visited Wausau yesterday.

WSAU news sent a reporter to cover the visit.

Nothing unusual happened. A candidate gave a stump speech about the economy and jobs. All typical campaign-trail stuff.

But everything leading up to yesterday’s Barrett appearance was not typical.

Barrett’s campaign never told us that he was coming to Wausau. His stop in Wausau was mentioned in a newswire story from his stop in LaCrosse a day earlier. No press release was sent to our newsroom. No campaign representative called us.

Knowing that he was coming, we were looking for the time of Barrett’s arrival. We went on-line and searched for his web site. I’m sure he has one. But for you search “Tom Barrett for Governor”, his official campaign web site doesn’t come up. A Facebook fan page does… but that’s maintained by his supporters, and doesn’t have a campaign schedule.

We searched the on-line phone book for Barrett campaign headquarters. We couldn’t find it.

We made contact with another news organization in Milwaukee. Could they share some contact information with us? All they had was the Mayor’s office in Milwaukee. Not a campaign office.

Eventually, after a call to a reporter at the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, we had a phone number where we could reach someone from the Barrett campaign.

Isn’t one of the lessons from Massachusetts that you can’t run a lackadaisical, disorganized campaign and expect to win? Tom Barrett is the likely Democratic nominee for Governor. Many people consider him the front-runner. Barrett and his supporters should not expect a victory unless they get their act together.

Barrett doesn’t seem to want to run, which explains the Hamlet “Will I or won’t I” decision making. However, not long before his eventual entry into the race, The Messiah Himself, Barack Hussein Obama, paid the state a visit.

What happened is pure speculation, but Barrett wants to run for Herb Kohl’s seat in 2012. Most likely, the four-term senator and owner of the Milwaukee Bucks won’t seek re-election. Barrett will need backing from Washington Democrats to make a successful run. My personal theory is Obama told him, in his best Chicago Way approach: “Look, either you get in the race for governor in 2010, or we’ll pick someone else to back in 2012.”

Given the fact that Obama has been the kiss of death in Virginia, New Jersey and now Massachusetts, that might not be a bad thing.

Meanwhile, Barrett’s likely GOP opponent, Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker, has been criss-crossing the state with a Scott Brown-like energetic campaign.

This does not bode well for Barrett, especially in a year which is trending as a red tsunami to begin with.

Maybe this guy has a chance.

Stewart Mocks The Olbertard

Via NewsBusters.

Brilliant satirical special comment from Jon Stewart of The Daily Show as he lays the smackdown on The Olbertard for his hateful, vile comments directed at Scott Brown. Stewart also recalls other vile personal attacks launched by The Olbertard against others, including Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin.

You know, I think it’s time for a Special Comment on the subject of Keith Olbermann…How far, sir, how far will you fall?…But now, you’re just kind of calling people names. To wit, you said this of Joseph Isadore Lieberman, Democrat Connecticut: “a Senatorial prostitute.” Of Roger Ailes, “fat ass.” Chris Wallace, “a monkey posing as a newscaster.” Rush Limbaugh, a “big bag of mashed up jack-ass.”…And of Michelle Malkin, you said, “a mindless, morally bankrupt, knee-jerk, fascistic…mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it.” That my fine, feathered friend sounds a lot more like violence against women than anything Scott Brown ever said. You can’t resort to childish attacks as hominem as they are nauseam. You’ve ceded the high ground, and now you wallow in the fetid swamp of baseless, of baseless name-calling, and as we both know, sir, that’s my thing. It is beneath you, it is next to me. A man of your intellect need not be me: petty, pompous, pusillanimous, or poopy-head.

Will embed video as soon as I can find one that can be embedded. In the meantime, NewsBusters has the video.

37 Years Ago

The Supreme Court offered one of its worst rulings ever, right up alongside the Dred Scott decision: Roe v. Wade. A ruling so bad that the original plaintiff has since switched sides.

Since then, 50 million lives have been snuffed out, more than eight times the total of the Nazi death camps. Who can really comprehend the extent of that genocide?

That genocide has been targeted at the minority community, particularly blacks. Not surprising, since the founder of Planned Parenthood Barrenhood, Margaret Sanger, was an avowed supporter of eugenics and the elimination of so-called inferior people as well as a backer of Nazi Germany and Hitler and his theory of the master race.

Advocates of this genocide can’t deal with the fact that it is human life that is being snuffed out so they try to change the terms of the dialogue in attempts to de-humanize the baby that’s been conceived.

Quoting a Red State editorial:

The evil Roe v. Wade has wrought has cheapened and weakened our society. It has decimated minority population growth, especially among African-Americans. It has caused us to devalue the handicapped and less fortunate, as mothers who carry these precious children to full term are now somehow thought to be less responsible for the decision. The damage to the fabric of the family itself – the most basic building block of our society – has been incalculable.

Recall the development of the abortion industry. First, supporters told us it was just for the first trimester. Then, eventually it was OK to terminate pregnancies for babies in the second and third trimesters, all for the convenience of the living. Then, the horror of partial birth abortion was OK’d. Partial birth abortion is a procedure in which the baby is partially delivered then at a crucial point a suction device is inserted in the back of the baby’s skull and the brains sucked out by a vacuum. Now, even noted “ethicists” like the vile, despicable Peter Singer advocate the infanticide of babies up to 30 days following birth, all the while advocating, as Singer does, animal rights.

It’s an explanation also of how we as a society can yawn and say “Ho hum” when reading about a mother who gives birth then tosses the baby in a garbage can or a Port-a-John yet get all outraged when someone abuses animals. I recently had a debate with that type of person who told me he really didn’t care all that much about what happens to babies but that animals had no one to speak up for them.

I was taken aback by the callousness of the comment: animals had no one to speak up for them. Now I don’t condone abuse or neglect of animals, since I am a pet owner. But there is no equivalence between an animal and a human being. None at all. A society is judged on the basis of how it treats its most vulnerable: namely the very young and very old and the disabled. The Left has shown its true colors by supporting abortion on demand and in some cases euthanasia, the act of putting people to sleep. ObamaCare will do just that with the death panels, putting the most vulnerable to sleep, or at least denying them necessary medical care and leaving them to a slow, painful death.

Go back to the Red State editorial for a moment. There’s no question the SCOTUS endorsement of abortion as an unquestionable civil right has lead to the cheapening of human life and the lack of respect for the most vulnerable in our society, infants, children, the elderly, the disabled. Look at the sneering condescension of many on the Left for Sarah Palin’s decision to have a child with Down’s Syndrome.

We have this, for example, from a local lefty about Sarah Palin and her son, Trig:

Gee, Sarah, do you think that you had the baby at the age of 44 years old and have admitted to smoking marijuana, both of each alone can lead to birth defects, could have had something to do with it?

Is she that arrogant that she thinks she is immune to the laws of nature, or just that dumb. Thank goodness she’ll never be in an office of power.

Fortunately, Rick Esenberg at Shark and Shepherd and Charlie Sykes called out the hate. The Blogfather observes:

Sick and despicable, but unfortunately increasingly typical of compassionate tolerant liberal rhetoric. OK, I get that you hate Sarah Palin and most conservatives; I get that you think that your political opponents need to be destroyed, that you think conservatives are all liars, hypocrites, and bigots.

But the mockery of a woman’s decision to give birth to a special needs kid????

Have you no shame at all?

Giving birth to a special needs child isn’t a difficult decision at all, if you realize that it is a child, not a choice.

Still More Good Economic News

Both here in Wisconsin and across the nation.

First, here in Wisconsin, the jobless rate rose to 8.7 percent (H/T to Owen Robinson at Boots & Sabers), with 26,000 jobs disappearing in December.

Wisconsin’s unemployment rate surged abruptly to 8.7% in December from 8.2% in November, an unusually large and unexpected single-month increase, the state Department of Workforce Development reported Thursday.

December’s spike all but erased months of declines in the state’s jobless index. The seasonally adjusted jobless rate, which peaked at 9% in July, had been falling in the intervening four months through November, giving rise to hopes that the state was on the verge of recovery.

“This was unexpected,” said Eric Grosso, senior economist at the Department of Workforce Development.

December’s number was also significantly higher than the 5.9% rate one year earlier, in December 2008.

The state lost 26,100 jobs last month – an average of 842 people who lost their jobs each day. For the year, Wisconsin lost 163,000 jobs, which comes to 447 a day, the agency reported.

“This is a devastatingly horrible labor market,” said Michael Rosen, who teaches economics at the Milwaukee Area Technical College.

Ouch.

And now Gov. Jim Milhous Doyleone wants to hit the state’s sagging economy with this, an equivalent of an Acme anvil. A green jobs bill announced earlier this month which forces many of the stringent requires of cap-and-tax on Wisconsin.

MADISON – Governor Jim Doyle today was joined by business leaders, labor, legislators and environmental organizations as he launched the Clean Energy Jobs Act, a landmark legislative package to accelerate the state’s green economy and create jobs. New industry-recognized research shows the package will directly create at least 15,000 green jobs in Wisconsin by 2025.

“Addressing climate change is not just an environmental issue, it’s about creating green jobs,” Governor Doyle said. “The Clean Energy Jobs Act offers new standards to help accelerate Wisconsin’s green economy. I am calling on the Legislature to update renewable portfolio standards to generate 25 percent of our fuel from renewable sources by 2025 and set a realistic goal of a 2 percent annual reduction in energy consumption by 2015.”

The Clean Energy Jobs Act, State Senate Bill 450 and State Assembly Bill 649, implements the recommendations of Governor Doyle’s Global Warming Task Force to address climate change and grow the state’s green economy through several key measures:

  • Enhanced renewable portfolio standards – A new 20 percent standard would be set for 2020 and a 25 percent standard would be set for 2025. The current 10 percent standard would be accelerated from 2015 to 2013. By advancing our current renewable portfolio standards, and setting new standards, we will ensure more of our energy dollars stay in the state, creating thousands of jobs for Wisconsin families in fields like construction, manufacturing, and agriculture.
  • Enhanced energy efficiency and conservation efforts – Graduated statewide electricity savings goals would be set, leading up to a 2 percent reduction by 2015 and annual reductions thereafter. The cheapest way to lower carbon emissions is through energy conservation. By setting achievable conservation goals, this bill will help reduce energy costs in businesses and homes across the state.

They’re dreaming if this is going to create 15,000 new jobs. What kind of jobs are so-called green jobs anyway? Building solar panels? Constructing wind mills? Here’s a definition of a “green job”:

… work in agricultural, manufacturing, research and development (R&D), administrative, and service activities that contribute(s) substantially to preserving or restoring environmental quality. Specifically, but not exclusively, this includes jobs that help to protect ecosystems and biodiversity; reduce energy, materials, and water consumption through high efficiency strategies; de-carbonize the economy; and minimize or altogether avoid generation of all forms of waste and pollution.

Yeah right. When pigs fly. You can only build so many solar panels and windmills, and what are the odds those are going to be built outside of Wisconsin, where costs are lower and shipped here?

Plus, all the mandates will increase costs to businesses, and those will be passed on to consumers. That’s just wonderful for job creation. Diamond Jim and the Democrats are trying to kill every last job in Wisconsin, much like Our Lord and Savior are the Democrats are trying to do to the country.

By the way, 15,000 new green jobs by 2025 averages out to 1,500 new jobs per year. Considering that we lost over 26,000 real jobs last month, the mindless chimpanzees in Madison are offering a band aid when a tourniquet is needed.

Across the nation, things aren’t any better.

WASHINGTON (al-AP) — A surprising jump in first-time claims for unemployment aid sent a painful reminder Thursday that jobs remain scarce six months into the economic recovery.

The surge in last week’s claims deflated hopes among some analysts that the economy would produce a net gain in jobs in January and help fuel the recovery.

A Labor Department analyst said much of the increase was due to holiday-season-related administrative backlogs at the state agencies that process the claims. Still, economists noted that that would mean claims in previous weeks had been artificially low. Those earlier declines had sparked optimism that layoffs were tapering and that employers would add a modest number of jobs in January.

The January employment report will be issued Feb. 5. But the surveys used to compile that report were done last week, so economists are paying close attention to the jobless claims figures from that week.

“The trend in the data is still discouraging,” Diane Swonk, chief economist for Mesirow Financial, wrote in a note to clients. “Hopes for a positive employment number in January … are rapidly dimming.”

Given the news we previously reported and commented on here, it’s a wonder anyone was surprised by the increase in jobless claims.

December retail sales were down. 2009 was the single biggest drop in retail sales on record. As a nation, we’ve lost over 4 million jobs since Barack Hussein Obama took office. As we wrote less than a month ago:

What’s on the horizon isn’t good the economy, either. The pending takeover of the nation’s health care system by the federal government with its myriad of new taxes and regulations and spending. Cap-and-tax, the massive carbon and energy tax aimed at fighting the fiction known as man-made global warming. Blanket amnesty for illegal aliens, thrusting 12 million potential workers into a workforce facing a real unemployment rate of 17.4 percent. The proposed European-style value-added tax, or VAT.

That’s why we won’t see the economic growth that the creation of real private sector jobs would bring.

Because no one in power in Washington is interested in creating those kind of jobs.

Washington and Madison are interested in growing two areas: the government sector and the dole, the number of people dependent on handouts from government. That guarantees their re-election. Everyone else be damned.

Once again, as we wrote here, there is a tailor-made opportunity for the Republicans, both here in Wisconsin and in Washington, to drive home what is needed to start creating real economic growth and real jobs: JFK- and Reagan-style tax cuts. Follow the lead of Sen.-elect Scott Brown (R-Mass.) and push for tax rates to be returned to the era prior to the Clinton tax hikes of 1993. And leave them there. Make sure the death tax stays buried permanently. Eliminate all capital gains taxes. Heck, even Europe, which Obama loves to emulate, has no capital gains taxes.

And cut spending. Real cuts, not those current services baseline reductions in the rate of growth. $2 trillion deficits as far as the eye can see are simply not sustainable for our economy. Yes, that includes real reform of the twin time bombs known as Medicare and Social Security.

Is The GOP Listening To Scott Brown?

Larry Kudlow asks just that question.

We know Our Lord and Savior Barack Hussein Obama and Democrats on Capitol Hill aren’t listening, given that they intend on ramming through the federal government’s takeover of the health care system through the reconciliation process.

Brown’s message included a clarion call for tax cuts like the ones proposed in 1962 by President Kennedy and in 1981 by President Reagan and again in 2001 and 2003 by President Bush.

Here’s what Brown said in his speech on Election Night:

I will work in the Senate to put the government back on the side of people who create jobs and the millions of people who need jobs. And remember, as President John F. Kennedy stated, that starts with across-the-board tax cuts for businesses and families to create jobs, put more money in people’s pockets, and stimulate the economy. It’s that simple.

As it stands today, there would be no room for JFK in the Democrat Party. This is no longer the party of JFK, Harry Truman, Scoop Jackson and Hubert Humphrey. It’s the party of, as John Ratzenberger said at a Brown rally on Sunday, Woodstock and as former Jeane Kirkpatrick once said, San Francisco.

JFK would be a moderate Republican by today’s standards. That’s how far off a cliff the Democrat Party has swerved.

Here’s what Kudlow has to say to congressional Republicans:

A recent Washington Post poll showed that by 58 to 38 percent, voters want smaller government and fewer government services. This, too, should be the Republican congressional message.

It is, in fact, an economic-growth message, the likes of which we haven’t heard since Jack Kemp promoted it in the late 1970s. And the brilliance of Scott Brown was to use the JFK tax cuts — an across-the-board reduction in marginal tax rates — to attract Democrats and independents to his message.

An across-the-board tax cut is the fairest pro-growth message of them all. Lower tax rates for everybody. Get out of the box of rich people and class warfare. For the Ted Kennedy Democrats, that box has been a loser for decades. But for timid Republicans always on the defensive, now is the time to break out and adopt the Scott Brown theme.

This is what Reagan did. This is why the Gipper touted JFK’s across-the-board tax cuts. Republicans must now be bold and fight for across-the-board tax relief, for families, individuals, and businesses, along with smaller government, fewer services, and across-the-board spending cuts.

The mantel of Ronald Reagan has been picked up, in Massachusetts, the unlikeliest of all places.

Republicans have become far too squeamish in defending the success of the Reagan-era tax cuts and have allowed the Democrats and the state-run media to rewrite the history of that era.

Reagan’s tax cuts doubled revenue by the end of the 1980s. Doubled the amount of money coming into the federal treasury. Why did deficits increase? Blame the folks controlling the federal treasury: Congress. Run by Democrats, who spent money faster than it could come in. Every one of President Reagan’s budgets were pronounced DOA by the Democrats, and since the president does not have a line item veto, Reagan was forced to sign the budget eventually passed by Congress.

The American people are staring down the barrel of a gun aimed right between their eyes when the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of the year. That’s a massive tax increase not voted on by Congress that will start having a real impact on average Americans January 1, 2011.

If the folks who put the “con” in Congress are really serious about creating economic growth and real jobs, they’ll take action to keep the Bush tax cuts in place and look to cut taxes across the board some more.

Oh, say, maybe back to the Reagan era.

House Dems Double Down On Stupid

From Rep. Paul Ryan via The Corner comes word that House Democrats still plan on ramming through government-run health care via the reconciliation process.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), the ranking member of the House Budget Committee, tells National Review Online that House Democrats are planning to use of the budget-reconciliation process in order to pass Obamacare. “They’re meeting with each other this weekend to pursue it,” says Ryan. “I’ve spoken with many Democrats and the message is this: They’re not ready to give up. They’ve waited their entire adult lives for this moment and they aren’t ready to let 100,000 pesky votes in Massachusetts get in the way of fulfilling their destiny. They’ll look at every option and spend the next four or five days figuring it out.”

If the Democrats pass a health-care bill through reconciliation, it means they would need only 51 votes in the Senate for final passage. To start the process, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) would need to bring a new health-care bill to the House budget committee with reconciliation instructions, with the Senate doing the same. “They’d have to go back to the beginning of the process,” says Ryan. “They’d need to affix reconciliation instructions to a new bill.” Doing so, he says, wouldn’t be too hard. “There’s nothing we can do to stop this from a technical standpoint, since all they need is a simple majority vote and our ratio on the committee is terrible. What [Republicans] can do on the budget committee is pass resolutions for the Rules committee to insist on certain changes in the bill and create a ‘vote-a-rama’ atmosphere.”

This confirms what Fox News contributor Juan Williams reported on Hannity on Tuesday following the results of the special election in Massachusetts: that the Democrats and the White House were going to double down on stupid, ignoring the reality of the results of that election, clearly a referendum on not just the health care takeover but the entire Obama agenda and do what they wanted, the people be damned.

Memo to Bela Pelosi: please go ahead and try this. It’ll make the bloodbath in November even that more spectacular.

Allahpundit has more here at Hot Air.